« The NYSE and the Problems of Director Independence: The Plain Meaning of NYSE 303A.02 (Part 2) | Main | Director Fees and Director Independence »
Tuesday
Jun012010

The NYSE and the Problems of Director Independence (Part 1)

We have noted before on this Blog that the definition of independent director used by the NYSE does not in fact ensure that directors are independent (the definition doesn't take friendship into account). The definition also disqualifies from independent any director with a material financial relationship.  Yet the exchanges apparently do not enforced this standard with respect to director fees, despite their often prodigious amount of the payments.

Given these limitations, the argument can be made that the reference to "independent director" under the rules of the stock exchanges is misleading.  Most ordinary investors would likely believe that independent boards contain a majority of directors without significant ties to the company or the CEO.  In fact, this is not the case.  The problems with the definition and enforcement came to the fore in the recent decision by Black & Decker and Stanley Works to merge.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.