« And Then There Were Two: Lehman, the Board, and the Need for Access | Main | And Then There Were Two: An End to Independent Investment Banking Firms in the United States »

And Then There Were Two: The Disappearance of Independent Investment Banking Firms and the New Weakest Links

Posted on Monday, September 15, 2008 at 10:30AM by Registered CommenterJ. Robert Brown | CommentsPost a Comment

With Lehman and Merrill gone, two independent investment banking firms remain:  Goldman and Morgan.  Which will be next for rumors and expressions of concern from the market?  Morgan Stanley, most likely.  But in either event, both may well have a tough time of things.  As the WSJ notes

  • The firms live or die by market confidence, given their reliance on wholesale funding, and that has clearly evaporated for the smaller firms. The lure of more stable balance-sheet funding will be strong even for Goldman and Morgan Stanley. The question is who would they partner with? There isn't a long list of banks big enough to step up.
  • Even if Goldman and Morgan Stanley dodge the immediate danger, they need to lock in a funding model that is not susceptible to a sudden loss of confidence. Otherwise, they remain at the mercy of the market.
In other words, the outcome is inevitable.  Either they will suffer the fate of Lehman/Merrill or will need to partner with someone that will provide the market will additional confidence and allow them to survive periods of market instability.  Who will this be?  Commercial banks, of course.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.